How do you read the ending of Death Comes for the Archbishop? How does Cather’s style and the mood support your reading?
Cather uses stories throughout the novel to support Latour’s story and represent a tradition of folklore. In the end, Latour is not remembered for the church but rather for these stories that make up his essence. One can argue that even Western civilization with all of its technology and power cannot stand up to the power of stories. Stories and how one is remembered through stories ends up being the essence of you. Sometimes it’s the whole truth, sometimes it’s what somebody wants the truth to be, and occasionally it’s just mostly true (probably the best thing in the long run). Unlike the movements of the 60s and 70s, the theme of this novel is acceptance rather than peace or love. Peace and love are ten steps ahead of acceptance. And if we don’t begin with acceptance and, first, make bigotry and hate unacceptable, we can never reach peace and love.
Does the novel suggest a mystical experience of New Mexico? Explain.
The reader is introduced to New Mexico through Latour. As a religious person, he is very open to mystical happenings in the world around him. As a result, his descriptions are full of mystery and awe. I’m not sure whether other religious figures would be as accepting but Latour is and as a result represents almost a perfect white man. If only all newcomers were like him. The novel also explores a very interesting coming together between organized religion and spirituality. Spirituality is typically considered very un-Christian but in the novel it is as if Cather is saying that there is no one superior approach. Her theme is acceptance and she embraces many different ways of doing things. (I would argue that this concept by itself makes her a heretic).